Lucretia A. Richmond


If you’re confused about why you’re looking at a photo of a young man when the title of this post is Lucretia A. Richmond, let me explain.


Upon purchasing this tintype I found a piece of paper affixed to the reverse.  It reads “L.A. Richmond Belleville Kansas.”  Also written in the upper corner is 165 with either a dollar or numeral symbol.  Puzzling!  I found no Richmond men with the intials L.A. living in or around Belleville.  And that leads me to suspect L.A. Richmond was not our sitter, but might have been the photographer, Lucretia Ann Richmond.

Lucretia, who never married, was born in 1863 in Ohio.  Her childhood is a mystery.  Her family doesn’t appear on census records until 1900 when it’s just Lucretia and her widowed mother living in Belleville, Kansas.  Lucretia’s occupation was recorded as an artist, a term many photographers used.

The only traces of Lucretia’s father, Edward R. Richmond, are from Preble County, Ohio. He wed Lucretia’s mother, Miss Mary Clayton, in 1862.  At the age of 25, in June 1863, Edward registered for the Civil War Draft.  At the time he was a cabinet maker.

And this leads me to another possibility for this tintype.  Could it be a photograph of Lucretia’s father?  Perhaps a copy Lucretia had made of an earlier tintype or ambrotype.  Maybe the slip of paper affixed to the back denoted who the photo was to be picked up by or delivered to.  The notation of #165 might have been an order or invoice number.

There sure are a lot of “what ifs,” but no matter what the answer to this mystery may be, I’m left thinking about Lucretia. She continued her career as an artist until her death at the age of 77 years.  According to her great, great nephew, Richard Easley, Lucretia was known for her paintings.  How I wish I’d been able to find examples of her art work and/or photography.

Lucretia, who lived with her mother all her life, died in 1940 just 20 days after her mother passed and the two are buried in Glendale, California.

Census records
Find a Grave

7 thoughts on “Lucretia A. Richmond

  1. When I see one of your posts, I look at the image and am always amazed at what you manage to find out.
    Have you ever seen the Stephen Poliakoff film ‘Shooting the Past’ if not, I think you would enjoy it.
    Adding historical context is so important, sadly I don’t see it continuing with this digital age, the delete button is easily used.
    Then again who will be able to open a jpeg, tif, nef, or a multitude of other formats in 2120.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Lucretia had no siblings. I just wish I was better at dating men’s fashion so I knew if it was even possible if this could be her father. It would have to be the very early 1860s when her father would have been early 20s and I still think this sitter might be younger than that.

      Liked by 2 people

      1. Another possibility is that she had a beau who died young and had this image made to remember him by. I do think the outfit could be from the 1860s, but I’m not really an expert. It could also be from a later period. It seems tintypes we’re out of favor by the late 1880s, weren’t they?

        Liked by 2 people

    2. Oh yes, this young man could have been a beau, a cousin, or a friend. On the 1910 census record Lucretia’s occupation is listed as a portrait artist which leads me to ponder whether this was a tintype delivered to her so that she could create a painting from it. Cabinet cards seem to be the most prevalent during the 1880s, but that being said, I have many tintypes dating throughout the 1880s and into the early 1890s. I’m glad someone other than me enjoys this mystery!

      Liked by 2 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s